The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep per GNG. Yes, the article needs to be expanded, but
coverage of the subject continues into 2021 and is not limited to their appearance on the TV show. Also, I've asked the nominator to slow down on the RPDR contestant deletion noms. ---
Another Believer(
Talk) 18:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
As there is already a discussion on
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race#Nicky_Doll_AfD_nomination about this, I don't understand how your comment is relevant to this nomination. I have already asked you to point me to guidelines about the number of AfD that one can nominate, but as of now you still haven't. I don't think this comment adds any value to this nomination or demonstrates that I am not following guidelines. --
Underpaid Intern (
talk) 18:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Underpaid Intern, Well, you're not exactly following the process correctly by nominating this article for being "mainly about her participation in RuPaul's Drag Race". You're basing your argument on the current article's text, not all available coverage of the subject. No one would dispute these articles need to be expanded, but just because they are stubs does not mean the topics are not notable.
WP:BEFORE. ---
Another Believer(
Talk) 18:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Echoing Another Believer's rationale: coverage of the subject has continued years after their initial appearance on RPDR.
This 2021 Instinct piece mentioned above calls the subject "beloved";
This 2021 piece shows the subject made the cover of Worcester Magazine; there's
this 2019 Worcester Telegram piece; there's
this 2016 piece from the Worcester Telegram; etc. Then there's the coverage in relation to their appearance on the show, including coverage from The Advocatehere; Boston.com
here; and much more. Overall, I'd say this passes GNG. --
Kbabej (
talk) 19:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 03:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep per GNG. Yes, the article needs to be expanded, but
coverage of the subject continues into 2021 and is not limited to their appearance on the TV show. Also, I've asked the nominator to slow down on the RPDR contestant deletion noms. ---
Another Believer(
Talk) 18:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
As there is already a discussion on
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race#Nicky_Doll_AfD_nomination about this, I don't understand how your comment is relevant to this nomination. I have already asked you to point me to guidelines about the number of AfD that one can nominate, but as of now you still haven't. I don't think this comment adds any value to this nomination or demonstrates that I am not following guidelines. --
Underpaid Intern (
talk) 18:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Underpaid Intern, Well, you're not exactly following the process correctly by nominating this article for being "mainly about her participation in RuPaul's Drag Race". You're basing your argument on the current article's text, not all available coverage of the subject. No one would dispute these articles need to be expanded, but just because they are stubs does not mean the topics are not notable.
WP:BEFORE. ---
Another Believer(
Talk) 18:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Echoing Another Believer's rationale: coverage of the subject has continued years after their initial appearance on RPDR.
This 2021 Instinct piece mentioned above calls the subject "beloved";
This 2021 piece shows the subject made the cover of Worcester Magazine; there's
this 2019 Worcester Telegram piece; there's
this 2016 piece from the Worcester Telegram; etc. Then there's the coverage in relation to their appearance on the show, including coverage from The Advocatehere; Boston.com
here; and much more. Overall, I'd say this passes GNG. --
Kbabej (
talk) 19:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Missvain (
talk) 03:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.