The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Samee: Jatland.com is not an acceptable source or an indicator of notability -- it is a user-contributed wiki. The person who
authored the Wikipedia article also
wrote the article on Jatland.com. In fact, the Jatland.com wiki was established because Wikipedia editors started deleting Jat propaganda from Wikipedia. The website relies on a mixture of pseudo-history, obsolete colonial theories, and downright lies to make absurd claims. E.g. It claims that ancient kings like Chandragupta, Ashoka, Kanishka etc. were Jats
[1], and that the
Kushan Empire was founded by Kaswan Jats
[2].
utcursch |
talk23:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you for informing me. I did not see the history of the Wikipedia article at that time. I know that Jatland.com is not a RS. The article was of single line, that's why I relied on that source. I've struck the vote. Once again, thanks.
Convert to disambiguation page – Joon clan not only fails
notability but also wrongly placed as the
primary topic. But
Joon should not be deleted because it clearly meets
disambiguation criteria, as can be seen
in this revision of Joon, which is in fact suggested by the nom. As there's no primary topic here, there's no need to add the tag "(disambiguation)", as per
WP:DABNAME. And, according to WP:DABNAME,
Joon (disambiguation) should be redirected to
Joon.
PS:
WP:DISCUSSAFD states that alternatives to deletion should be considered. If you think the article should be a disambiguation page, a redirect or merger to another article, then recommend "Disambiguation", "Redirect" or "Merge". Do not recommend deletion in such cases. -
NitinMlk (
talk)
19:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Samee: Jatland.com is not an acceptable source or an indicator of notability -- it is a user-contributed wiki. The person who
authored the Wikipedia article also
wrote the article on Jatland.com. In fact, the Jatland.com wiki was established because Wikipedia editors started deleting Jat propaganda from Wikipedia. The website relies on a mixture of pseudo-history, obsolete colonial theories, and downright lies to make absurd claims. E.g. It claims that ancient kings like Chandragupta, Ashoka, Kanishka etc. were Jats
[1], and that the
Kushan Empire was founded by Kaswan Jats
[2].
utcursch |
talk23:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you for informing me. I did not see the history of the Wikipedia article at that time. I know that Jatland.com is not a RS. The article was of single line, that's why I relied on that source. I've struck the vote. Once again, thanks.
Convert to disambiguation page – Joon clan not only fails
notability but also wrongly placed as the
primary topic. But
Joon should not be deleted because it clearly meets
disambiguation criteria, as can be seen
in this revision of Joon, which is in fact suggested by the nom. As there's no primary topic here, there's no need to add the tag "(disambiguation)", as per
WP:DABNAME. And, according to WP:DABNAME,
Joon (disambiguation) should be redirected to
Joon.
PS:
WP:DISCUSSAFD states that alternatives to deletion should be considered. If you think the article should be a disambiguation page, a redirect or merger to another article, then recommend "Disambiguation", "Redirect" or "Merge". Do not recommend deletion in such cases. -
NitinMlk (
talk)
19:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.