- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Not a good article, but that's for cleanup. Randykitty ( talk) 18:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Joom
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject doesn't posses enough notability itself to pass WP:GNG, including WP:Reliable sources, etc. Possible COI/WP:Promo Me4ysŁaw ( talk) 14:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Latvia. Shellwood ( talk) 14:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep (on conditions): Seems to be a decently known platform judging by the number of downloads and user reviews in the Play Store and the Apple App Store, however, it could certainly use a heavy overhaul to conform to standards. Shirsakbc ( talk) 21:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep has enough citations and 2 from Techcrunch, which is considered reliable. Craigwikiman ( talk) 15:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep enough reliable sources to count as notable. Newystats ( talk) 05:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Not a good article, but that's for cleanup. Randykitty ( talk) 18:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Joom
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject doesn't posses enough notability itself to pass WP:GNG, including WP:Reliable sources, etc. Possible COI/WP:Promo Me4ysŁaw ( talk) 14:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Latvia. Shellwood ( talk) 14:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep (on conditions): Seems to be a decently known platform judging by the number of downloads and user reviews in the Play Store and the Apple App Store, however, it could certainly use a heavy overhaul to conform to standards. Shirsakbc ( talk) 21:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 15:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep has enough citations and 2 from Techcrunch, which is considered reliable. Craigwikiman ( talk) 15:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep enough reliable sources to count as notable. Newystats ( talk) 05:13, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.