- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JomRun ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article about a non-notable mobile app. Actively asserts non-notability, having "300-400 active users everyday". Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. MER-C 19:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. TMG talk 20:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, possibly speedy: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Primary sources and PR for a startup. Basie ( talk) 11:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems fair-- JamesLee90 ( talk) 15:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC) — JamesLee90 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JomRun ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article about a non-notable mobile app. Actively asserts non-notability, having "300-400 active users everyday". Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. MER-C 19:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. TMG talk 20:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 04:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, possibly speedy: does not meet WP:NCORP; sourcing is routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. Promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Primary sources and PR for a startup. Basie ( talk) 11:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems fair-- JamesLee90 ( talk) 15:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC) — JamesLee90 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.