- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn, per improvements to the article.
BD2412
T 14:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
John Ruhl (physicist)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- John Ruhl (physicist) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be a run-of-the-mill professor. No independent sources in the article. Not seeing any indicia of encyclopedic notability in terms of external coverage. BD2412 T 02:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 02:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. A stunning pass of WP:Prof#C1 on GS citations. A trout for the nominator (an administrator, no less). Xxanthippe ( talk) 04:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC).
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Ohio. Skynxnex ( talk) 04:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: per meeting WP:PROF based on high citation counts of his works (see Scopus via the Authority Control). TJMSmith ( talk) 04:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I was intrigued by the above comments. I was still surprised when I clicked the "scholar" link. Meets PROF. — siro χ o 04:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. In addition to the obvious pass of WP:PROF#C1, he passes #C3 as a Fellow of the American Physical Society (included as a category already in the as-nominated article) and his title of Connecticut Professor appears to give him a pass of #C5. This bad nomination should be withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 05:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn, per improvements to the article.
BD2412
T 14:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
John Ruhl (physicist)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- John Ruhl (physicist) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be a run-of-the-mill professor. No independent sources in the article. Not seeing any indicia of encyclopedic notability in terms of external coverage. BD2412 T 02:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 02:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. A stunning pass of WP:Prof#C1 on GS citations. A trout for the nominator (an administrator, no less). Xxanthippe ( talk) 04:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC).
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Ohio. Skynxnex ( talk) 04:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: per meeting WP:PROF based on high citation counts of his works (see Scopus via the Authority Control). TJMSmith ( talk) 04:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I was intrigued by the above comments. I was still surprised when I clicked the "scholar" link. Meets PROF. — siro χ o 04:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. In addition to the obvious pass of WP:PROF#C1, he passes #C3 as a Fellow of the American Physical Society (included as a category already in the as-nominated article) and his title of Connecticut Professor appears to give him a pass of #C5. This bad nomination should be withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 05:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.