From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker talk 18:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

John May (executive)

John May (executive) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not inherently notable and does not pass GNG. Notability is reliant on one 'award'. Article would be best redirected to the page for that award: /info/en/?search=Queen's_Award_for_Enterprise_Promotion isfutile:P ( talk) 21:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, given that the subject is notable for being an executive of a company that is not itself notable enough for an article. WP:USUAL may apply, of course. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 22:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - searches don't show they pass notability criteria. At best redirect to the award page. Onel5969 TT me 13:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker talk 18:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

John May (executive)

John May (executive) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not inherently notable and does not pass GNG. Notability is reliant on one 'award'. Article would be best redirected to the page for that award: /info/en/?search=Queen's_Award_for_Enterprise_Promotion isfutile:P ( talk) 21:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, given that the subject is notable for being an executive of a company that is not itself notable enough for an article. WP:USUAL may apply, of course. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 22:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - searches don't show they pass notability criteria. At best redirect to the award page. Onel5969 TT me 13:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook