The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I agree with
Shoessss about lack of information but I'm concerned that the subject of this article himself has been trying to get it removed. The e-books he has evidently written have apparently been withdrawn from the internet only recently, apart from their title pages. It seems this man is under some pressure and I think the site should remove this article quickly: after all, it can always be recreated. In addition, it appears to me that the two cricket societies named may not meet the terms of
WP:RS because I suspect that they are publishing their own members' material: in-house, as it were. Perhaps someone with more knowledge could clarify that. --
JamesJJames (
talk)
08:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I agree with
Shoessss about lack of information but I'm concerned that the subject of this article himself has been trying to get it removed. The e-books he has evidently written have apparently been withdrawn from the internet only recently, apart from their title pages. It seems this man is under some pressure and I think the site should remove this article quickly: after all, it can always be recreated. In addition, it appears to me that the two cricket societies named may not meet the terms of
WP:RS because I suspect that they are publishing their own members' material: in-house, as it were. Perhaps someone with more knowledge could clarify that. --
JamesJJames (
talk)
08:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.