The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Two pro-forma obituaries do not sufficient notability make, I'm sorry to say. No indication of any further coverage, or anything touching WP:NPROF for his professional life. Wikipedia is not the right place for this memorial. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 01:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.Reviews exist, but the majority of them seem to be meh to middling; and I wouldn't agree that they demonstrate a "significant or well-known work or collective body of work". One would expect that conclusion to be explicitly drawn somewhere (e.g., an in-depth obituary would have been the place). - To put it another way, a dozen reviews which do not add up to a an assessment of the work as significant, do not satisfy WP:AUTHOR. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep. More than enough reviews to qualify. Haukur ( talk) 15:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 04:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Two pro-forma obituaries do not sufficient notability make, I'm sorry to say. No indication of any further coverage, or anything touching WP:NPROF for his professional life. Wikipedia is not the right place for this memorial. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 01:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.Reviews exist, but the majority of them seem to be meh to middling; and I wouldn't agree that they demonstrate a "significant or well-known work or collective body of work". One would expect that conclusion to be explicitly drawn somewhere (e.g., an in-depth obituary would have been the place). - To put it another way, a dozen reviews which do not add up to a an assessment of the work as significant, do not satisfy WP:AUTHOR. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 13:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Keep. More than enough reviews to qualify. Haukur ( talk) 15:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)