- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Aapo (film). Randykitty ( talk) 17:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Johanna Piiroinen
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Johanna Piiroinen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another one of these pages that has been around forever. Anyway-former child actress with an amazing 1 role. It says she starred in it (though based off of credit listings she is pretty low on the credits), can't find much notability. So either redirect to Aapo or delete. Wgolf ( talk) 22:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 22:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 22:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 22:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT. As GNG states, "Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article." GNG superseeds WP:ENT anyways. If we cannot prove her notability with verifiable sources, then it cannot stand. Regarding redicretion, I am not sure how useful that would be. The page barely gets 5 views a week [1]. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 06:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Other than IMDB (which as WP:UGC is not a WP:RS), unsourced after 13 years. Not that there's any real content worth saving. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Aapo (film). Randykitty ( talk) 17:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Johanna Piiroinen
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Johanna Piiroinen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another one of these pages that has been around forever. Anyway-former child actress with an amazing 1 role. It says she starred in it (though based off of credit listings she is pretty low on the credits), can't find much notability. So either redirect to Aapo or delete. Wgolf ( talk) 22:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 22:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 22:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 22:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT. As GNG states, "Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article." GNG superseeds WP:ENT anyways. If we cannot prove her notability with verifiable sources, then it cannot stand. Regarding redicretion, I am not sure how useful that would be. The page barely gets 5 views a week [1]. HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 06:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Other than IMDB (which as WP:UGC is not a WP:RS), unsourced after 13 years. Not that there's any real content worth saving. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.