From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Joburg Giants (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NSPORT. I may be missing some criteria that would allow for a team like this to meet WP guidelines, but how could a team that's never had a professional match be notable enough for it's own WP page? It seems WP:TOOSOON for this team to have it's own page - at the very least additional sources needed to be provided to substantiate claims of notability. Comatmebro ( talk) 18:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 18:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Update - squads now announced. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Changing to Snow Keep as events of the last few days have overtaken the argument for deletion. There has been a lot of recent press coverage of matters relating to the teams in the tournament, such as squad selections, match schedule, and other details. There was always a fairly good chance that notability would firm up before this AFD could close. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 11:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Joburg Giants (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NSPORT. I may be missing some criteria that would allow for a team like this to meet WP guidelines, but how could a team that's never had a professional match be notable enough for it's own WP page? It seems WP:TOOSOON for this team to have it's own page - at the very least additional sources needed to be provided to substantiate claims of notability. Comatmebro ( talk) 18:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 18:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Update - squads now announced. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Changing to Snow Keep as events of the last few days have overtaken the argument for deletion. There has been a lot of recent press coverage of matters relating to the teams in the tournament, such as squad selections, match schedule, and other details. There was always a fairly good chance that notability would firm up before this AFD could close. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 11:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook