The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - As the nominator for PROD. Even though most of her work is for theatre, and IMDb isn’t a great indicator for that, it’s clear that her theatre career has not generated sufficient substantial coverage to meet
WP:GNGCardiffbear88 (
talk)
08:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The citations that are accessible mention subject only in passing, and include primary sources (thisistheatre; a cast listing; and the EvStandard article merely a show announcement) and one permanent dead link. Not enough to establish notability.
sixtynine• whaddya want? •20:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
I reviewed the sources. It is inaccurate to say that the reviews that talk about Gibb's performance and include a quote from her mention her only in passing.
DiamondRemley39 (
talk)
21:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as meets
WP:NACTOR #1 for various theatre roles. I checked out some of the sources listed by another editor and found some of my own. There is this significant coverage in the article and more.
DiamondRemley39 (
talk)
22:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as the article has been significantly improved since its nomination when it was unreferenced with the addition of multiple reliable sources references that confirm that Gibb has had a number of leading roles in notable theatre productions and therefore passes
WP:NACTOR and deserves to be included, in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
21:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: I looked at some of the sources that have been added, and Gibb is often singled out as the lead actress in a play, even when no other actors are mentioned. —
Toughpigs (
talk)
19:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - As the nominator for PROD. Even though most of her work is for theatre, and IMDb isn’t a great indicator for that, it’s clear that her theatre career has not generated sufficient substantial coverage to meet
WP:GNGCardiffbear88 (
talk)
08:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The citations that are accessible mention subject only in passing, and include primary sources (thisistheatre; a cast listing; and the EvStandard article merely a show announcement) and one permanent dead link. Not enough to establish notability.
sixtynine• whaddya want? •20:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
I reviewed the sources. It is inaccurate to say that the reviews that talk about Gibb's performance and include a quote from her mention her only in passing.
DiamondRemley39 (
talk)
21:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as meets
WP:NACTOR #1 for various theatre roles. I checked out some of the sources listed by another editor and found some of my own. There is this significant coverage in the article and more.
DiamondRemley39 (
talk)
22:09, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as the article has been significantly improved since its nomination when it was unreferenced with the addition of multiple reliable sources references that confirm that Gibb has had a number of leading roles in notable theatre productions and therefore passes
WP:NACTOR and deserves to be included, in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
21:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: I looked at some of the sources that have been added, and Gibb is often singled out as the lead actress in a play, even when no other actors are mentioned. —
Toughpigs (
talk)
19:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.