The result was Redirect to Catholic Answers. The points raised by the keep !voters generally stated that the article had sufficient references. However, there is also a general agreement that the sources in the article were not reliable and independent. As such, the result lies with the delete or merge !voters, who generally agreed that Jimmy Akin's coverage in Google News claimed sufficient noteworthiness that could be used in the Catholic Answers article.
Anything worth merging can be done from the article's history. ( non-admin closure) → Σ τ c. 01:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply
no real claim to notability, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. nothing satisfying WP:AUTHOR. prod removed without change. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Catholic Answers. The points raised by the keep !voters generally stated that the article had sufficient references. However, there is also a general agreement that the sources in the article were not reliable and independent. As such, the result lies with the delete or merge !voters, who generally agreed that Jimmy Akin's coverage in Google News claimed sufficient noteworthiness that could be used in the Catholic Answers article.
Anything worth merging can be done from the article's history. ( non-admin closure) → Σ τ c. 01:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply
no real claim to notability, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. nothing satisfying WP:AUTHOR. prod removed without change. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC) reply