- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 04:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Jim Johnson (theatre-maker/musician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jim Johnson (theatre-maker/musician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References on this page are passing mentions, not significant coverage, so I don't think the article meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability since 2013. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the sourcing is nowhere near enough to show notability. Based on the user name and very focused actions of the article creator, I have to wonder if this article was started as an autobiography. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 04:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Jim Johnson (theatre-maker/musician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jim Johnson (theatre-maker/musician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References on this page are passing mentions, not significant coverage, so I don't think the article meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability since 2013. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the sourcing is nowhere near enough to show notability. Based on the user name and very focused actions of the article creator, I have to wonder if this article was started as an autobiography. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.