- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 20:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Jetpak (Logistics Company)
- Jetpak (Logistics Company) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article about a company tagged for notability since March. It does not meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 16:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Surprisingly very little in coverage, even of the non-RS variety. Subject fails GNG and CORP. Article fails V. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 16:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 17:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 17:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: There is suspiciously little coverage, given what is stated in the article, which makes me wonder if there aren't deeper problems than merely lack of notability. Hithladaeus ( talk) 18:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The only thing I could find online consists of its acquisition. This company seems completely un-notable. Kage Acheron ( talk) 00:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Very non-notable company. SpeedDemon520 ( talk) 00:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 20:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Jetpak (Logistics Company)
- Jetpak (Logistics Company) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article about a company tagged for notability since March. It does not meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 16:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 15:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Surprisingly very little in coverage, even of the non-RS variety. Subject fails GNG and CORP. Article fails V. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 16:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 17:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 17:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: There is suspiciously little coverage, given what is stated in the article, which makes me wonder if there aren't deeper problems than merely lack of notability. Hithladaeus ( talk) 18:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The only thing I could find online consists of its acquisition. This company seems completely un-notable. Kage Acheron ( talk) 00:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Very non-notable company. SpeedDemon520 ( talk) 00:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.