From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Jesus the Worker Agro-industrial Training Center

Jesus the Worker Agro-industrial Training Center (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, promo, largely based on related websites (including the own and Facebook). The Banner  talk 23:23, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete - seems to be a clear-cut case of WP:G11, so it would be reasonable to tag it as such in case an admin agrees with my conclusion after reading the article. Kirbanzo ( talk) 23:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete more Jesuit agenda-driven promotional spam that fails GNG. SOurces given are peripheral glancing mentions, used to synthesize a promotional view of the subject that attempts an end-run around the traditional wiki practice of using in-depth sources in independent reliable publications. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 23:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. several very good sources, so the promotionalism can be fixed. Within our usual expectations for articles on charities-. DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, for reasons given just above. Jzsj ( talk) 18:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC) Note to closing admin: Jzsj ( talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Jesus the Worker Agro-industrial Training Center

Jesus the Worker Agro-industrial Training Center (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, promo, largely based on related websites (including the own and Facebook). The Banner  talk 23:23, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete - seems to be a clear-cut case of WP:G11, so it would be reasonable to tag it as such in case an admin agrees with my conclusion after reading the article. Kirbanzo ( talk) 23:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete more Jesuit agenda-driven promotional spam that fails GNG. SOurces given are peripheral glancing mentions, used to synthesize a promotional view of the subject that attempts an end-run around the traditional wiki practice of using in-depth sources in independent reliable publications. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 23:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. several very good sources, so the promotionalism can be fixed. Within our usual expectations for articles on charities-. DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, for reasons given just above. Jzsj ( talk) 18:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC) Note to closing admin: Jzsj ( talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook