The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 16:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete - seems to be a clear-cut case of
WP:G11, so it would be reasonable to tag it as such in case an admin agrees with my conclusion after reading the article.
Kirbanzo (
talk) 23:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete more Jesuit agenda-driven promotional spam that fails GNG. SOurces given are peripheral glancing mentions, used to synthesize a promotional view of the subject that attempts an end-run around the traditional wiki practice of using in-depth sources in independent reliable publications.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 23:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. several very good sources, so the promotionalism can be fixed. Within our usual expectations for articles on charities-. DGG (
talk ) 01:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep, for reasons given just above.
Jzsj (
talk) 18:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin:
Jzsj (
talk •
contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
AfD. reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 16:53, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete - seems to be a clear-cut case of
WP:G11, so it would be reasonable to tag it as such in case an admin agrees with my conclusion after reading the article.
Kirbanzo (
talk) 23:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete more Jesuit agenda-driven promotional spam that fails GNG. SOurces given are peripheral glancing mentions, used to synthesize a promotional view of the subject that attempts an end-run around the traditional wiki practice of using in-depth sources in independent reliable publications.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk) 23:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. several very good sources, so the promotionalism can be fixed. Within our usual expectations for articles on charities-. DGG (
talk ) 01:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep, for reasons given just above.
Jzsj (
talk) 18:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin:
Jzsj (
talk •
contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
AfD. reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.