- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 06:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Jessica Anderson (engineer)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jessica Anderson (engineer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable engineer. It seems that she is interviewed by the press often, discussing SpaceX launches, etc, but could not find many RS discussing her directly. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
It's not up to you to decide what is relevant but if Insprucker is deserving then so is Anderson. I would say number 3 engineer from Elon at SpaceX is relevant. ( talk)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:09, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the article in its current state - citing her Linkedin and Spotify accounts doesn't establish notability. More reliable sources discussing her are needed. Also, her profile pic is from her personal twitter, so it's unlikely to be a free image. -- Prosperosity ( talk) 06:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable engineer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Lacking in reliable sourcing. Also, the sourcing on the Insprucker article isn't rock solid, either. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 21:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 06:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Jessica Anderson (engineer)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jessica Anderson (engineer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable engineer. It seems that she is interviewed by the press often, discussing SpaceX launches, etc, but could not find many RS discussing her directly. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
It's not up to you to decide what is relevant but if Insprucker is deserving then so is Anderson. I would say number 3 engineer from Elon at SpaceX is relevant. ( talk)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:09, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the article in its current state - citing her Linkedin and Spotify accounts doesn't establish notability. More reliable sources discussing her are needed. Also, her profile pic is from her personal twitter, so it's unlikely to be a free image. -- Prosperosity ( talk) 06:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable engineer. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Lacking in reliable sourcing. Also, the sourcing on the Insprucker article isn't rock solid, either. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 21:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.