- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jerusalem-Project ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Truly impossible to tell, reading this, if this is a genuine initiative—and, if it is, what it does. So an apparent a fortiori fail of WP:N, WP:V, etc. It's ostensibly a collaboration between the International Peace and Cooperation Center ( [1]), Futura ( [2]), and the Lassalle Institute ( [3]). But it's impossible (at least for me) to tell what the nature of the collaboration is. Not quite WP:NONSENSE, but close in spirit. Sources are all primary, and mostly dead. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the opening line is overly promotional rubbish. We should not use phrasing like "win-win" in an encyclopedia. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Reads like a press release for the scheme. Number 5 7 10:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jerusalem-Project ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Truly impossible to tell, reading this, if this is a genuine initiative—and, if it is, what it does. So an apparent a fortiori fail of WP:N, WP:V, etc. It's ostensibly a collaboration between the International Peace and Cooperation Center ( [1]), Futura ( [2]), and the Lassalle Institute ( [3]). But it's impossible (at least for me) to tell what the nature of the collaboration is. Not quite WP:NONSENSE, but close in spirit. Sources are all primary, and mostly dead. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 06:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the opening line is overly promotional rubbish. We should not use phrasing like "win-win" in an encyclopedia. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Reads like a press release for the scheme. Number 5 7 10:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.