The result was delete. David Eppstein's contribution is the most compelling, and that view is shared by a sufficient number of his colleagues here in this debate to form a consensus to delete. Daniel ( talk) 21:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Just another probable COI/paid article about someone who's vaguely notable for being an 'educator/motivational speaker'. Ref bombed with articles that anyone can get made for them. Doesn't meet notability. Nswix ( talk) 19:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A formal source analysis would be very helpful if an editor wanted to put one together.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Liz's last relist comment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
*Keep - Although the article needs some work, there are several reliable sources in the article. These sources are clearly reliable and have been marked as such by Wikipedia for several years. The idea that all the major sources in the article marked as reliable by Wikipedia per
WP:NGRS are all no longer reliable is strange and illogical. This is painting with a very broad brush. Should we then delete all articles on Wikipedia, especially the ones from this individual’s country of origin whenever someone doesn’t like the sources that have always been accepted by the community as reliable, or the writing style of the publications. Also, saying that all the articles are paid promotions is speculative and illogical. There is no basis for this assumption. Also, all the articles are not similar other than the fact that some of them are profiling the same individual. All the sources provide significant coverage about the subject as required by
WP:SIGCOV and are reliable as per
WP:NGRS. The subject was listed as one of the 10 most influential Nigerians in diaspora by
Pulse Nigeria. He was recognized as one of the 10 most influential people in Hospitality by
The Nation. He was also named one of the top 25 International Newsmakers of 2021 which is enough to meet
WP:GNG and
WP:NBASIC. There is no rational basis for deleting this article. Most of the arguments are in favor of keeping the page. Why should the page not be kept and improved, like so many other pages on Wikipedia? Why the push to delete this page?
Cruzdoze (
talk)
13:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC) —
Cruzdoze (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. David Eppstein's contribution is the most compelling, and that view is shared by a sufficient number of his colleagues here in this debate to form a consensus to delete. Daniel ( talk) 21:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Just another probable COI/paid article about someone who's vaguely notable for being an 'educator/motivational speaker'. Ref bombed with articles that anyone can get made for them. Doesn't meet notability. Nswix ( talk) 19:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A formal source analysis would be very helpful if an editor wanted to put one together.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Liz's last relist comment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
*Keep - Although the article needs some work, there are several reliable sources in the article. These sources are clearly reliable and have been marked as such by Wikipedia for several years. The idea that all the major sources in the article marked as reliable by Wikipedia per
WP:NGRS are all no longer reliable is strange and illogical. This is painting with a very broad brush. Should we then delete all articles on Wikipedia, especially the ones from this individual’s country of origin whenever someone doesn’t like the sources that have always been accepted by the community as reliable, or the writing style of the publications. Also, saying that all the articles are paid promotions is speculative and illogical. There is no basis for this assumption. Also, all the articles are not similar other than the fact that some of them are profiling the same individual. All the sources provide significant coverage about the subject as required by
WP:SIGCOV and are reliable as per
WP:NGRS. The subject was listed as one of the 10 most influential Nigerians in diaspora by
Pulse Nigeria. He was recognized as one of the 10 most influential people in Hospitality by
The Nation. He was also named one of the top 25 International Newsmakers of 2021 which is enough to meet
WP:GNG and
WP:NBASIC. There is no rational basis for deleting this article. Most of the arguments are in favor of keeping the page. Why should the page not be kept and improved, like so many other pages on Wikipedia? Why the push to delete this page?
Cruzdoze (
talk)
13:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC) —
Cruzdoze (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.