From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. MBisanz talk 12:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Jay Hogart (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable TV character. Article full of excessive plot details and zero references. Gloss 13:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 15:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - No indication of notability. All info is in universe, no independent coverage. - SummerPhD ( talk) 16:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Merge into List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. Lacks notability on it's own but is part of a notable group. Tchaliburton ( talk) 14:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Television characters do not automatically qualify for separate standalone articles just because they exist — if you cannot add reliable sources which provide real-world context for why the character is a notable topic in an encyclopedia, then all they really warrant is inclusion in a list of characters. But that's not what this is — it's just an in-universe summary of plots he was involved in, which provides no demonstration whatsoever of why this belongs in an encyclopedia rather than a Degrassi fansite. Delete or merge into a character list unless real sources demonstrating real notability can actually be added. Bearcat ( talk) 22:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. MBisanz talk 12:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Jay Hogart (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable TV character. Article full of excessive plot details and zero references. Gloss 13:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 15:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - No indication of notability. All info is in universe, no independent coverage. - SummerPhD ( talk) 16:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Merge into List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. Lacks notability on it's own but is part of a notable group. Tchaliburton ( talk) 14:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Television characters do not automatically qualify for separate standalone articles just because they exist — if you cannot add reliable sources which provide real-world context for why the character is a notable topic in an encyclopedia, then all they really warrant is inclusion in a list of characters. But that's not what this is — it's just an in-universe summary of plots he was involved in, which provides no demonstration whatsoever of why this belongs in an encyclopedia rather than a Degrassi fansite. Delete or merge into a character list unless real sources demonstrating real notability can actually be added. Bearcat ( talk) 22:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook