The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Besides being non-notable, the page also looks more like an advertisement than an actual encycopledic entry. Statements like “will appeal to Twilight fans” are clear evidences of these. I considered editing the page, but a large percentage of it just advertisement. Bulls123 ( talk) 09:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
04:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Besides being non-notable, the page also looks more like an advertisement than an actual encycopledic entry. Statements like “will appeal to Twilight fans” are clear evidences of these. I considered editing the page, but a large percentage of it just advertisement. Bulls123 ( talk) 09:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
04:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)