The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 03:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Unsourced since creation in 2009 ( WP:V), written in a confusing, peacocky and unencyclopedic style that does not make much sense as a whole. A Google Books search indicates that this is or was indeed an Indian Rajput, and as such likely notable, but the current content is so useless that the article would need to be rewritten from scratch, or possibly redicted to some related other article. Sandstein 18:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 03:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Unsourced since creation in 2009 ( WP:V), written in a confusing, peacocky and unencyclopedic style that does not make much sense as a whole. A Google Books search indicates that this is or was indeed an Indian Rajput, and as such likely notable, but the current content is so useless that the article would need to be rewritten from scratch, or possibly redicted to some related other article. Sandstein 18:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply