From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jamnica (company). Sandstein 10:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Jana (brand)

Jana (brand) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN brand of water, would benefit being merged and redirected to its owner, Jamnica Night fury 10:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Night fury 10:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Night fury 10:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to Jamnica (company) - The product is likely notable (it won an award for "Highest Quality" at Europe's largest specialized water fair and assumably has some level of coverage in Croation sources which I'm not volunteering to search for) but per WP:PRODUCT "information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy." I've taken the liberty of making this edit showing the potential merged article and have self-reverted so as to await the result of this discussion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹ Speak 14:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep in principle, a notable regional brand & sufficient sources to demonstrate notability, agree with merge as suggested by Suriel1981. No such user ( talk) 12:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

*Delete because there's barely anything here, there's thousands of companies and no one made a good job on this article to show notability on it. Delete as non-notable. Hey you, yeah you! ( talk) 18:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note that the above editor seems to have been permanently blocked for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point - their conduct at AFDs was the primary concern thus I've taken the liberty of striking their !vote from the discussion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹ Speak 23:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jamnica (company). Sandstein 10:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Jana (brand)

Jana (brand) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN brand of water, would benefit being merged and redirected to its owner, Jamnica Night fury 10:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Night fury 10:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Night fury 10:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to Jamnica (company) - The product is likely notable (it won an award for "Highest Quality" at Europe's largest specialized water fair and assumably has some level of coverage in Croation sources which I'm not volunteering to search for) but per WP:PRODUCT "information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy." I've taken the liberty of making this edit showing the potential merged article and have self-reverted so as to await the result of this discussion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹ Speak 14:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep in principle, a notable regional brand & sufficient sources to demonstrate notability, agree with merge as suggested by Suriel1981. No such user ( talk) 12:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

*Delete because there's barely anything here, there's thousands of companies and no one made a good job on this article to show notability on it. Delete as non-notable. Hey you, yeah you! ( talk) 18:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note that the above editor seems to have been permanently blocked for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point - their conduct at AFDs was the primary concern thus I've taken the liberty of striking their !vote from the discussion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹ Speak 23:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook