The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep In spite of some of the article's obvious shortcomings, I think it should be kept because the subject meets two criteria listed at
WP:PROF. Criterion 1 ('research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline') is met because the subject has a high citation count on Google scholar of around 15,000 overall citations and an h-index of 66. Criterion 5 ('named chair or equivalent') is met because he is a full professor at Ghent. As has been discussed many times in AfDs like this, a full professorship in a good European university is the equivalent of a named chair in the United States. I should add that cutting unsuitable material in an otherwise notable article is always an option.
Modussiccandi (
talk)
21:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment - I
updated all of the articles's citations to add authors, dates, translations of non-English titles, etc. to better help anyone evaluating this article.
Platonk (
talk)
22:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Thee is no justification for draftification. The purpose of draftification is to raise an article to a standard that would passAfD., and since the subject does, improvements can be made just as well in mainspace. DGG (
talk )
21:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep In spite of some of the article's obvious shortcomings, I think it should be kept because the subject meets two criteria listed at
WP:PROF. Criterion 1 ('research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline') is met because the subject has a high citation count on Google scholar of around 15,000 overall citations and an h-index of 66. Criterion 5 ('named chair or equivalent') is met because he is a full professor at Ghent. As has been discussed many times in AfDs like this, a full professorship in a good European university is the equivalent of a named chair in the United States. I should add that cutting unsuitable material in an otherwise notable article is always an option.
Modussiccandi (
talk)
21:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment - I
updated all of the articles's citations to add authors, dates, translations of non-English titles, etc. to better help anyone evaluating this article.
Platonk (
talk)
22:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Thee is no justification for draftification. The purpose of draftification is to raise an article to a standard that would passAfD., and since the subject does, improvements can be made just as well in mainspace. DGG (
talk )
21:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.