- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) -- Pontificalibus 14:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Jailed for Freedom
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jailed for Freedom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There seems no evidence whatever for the notability of the book, as distinct from the individual.
DGG (
talk ) 08:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
DGG (
talk ) 22:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. A ProQuest search shows that the 1995 edition was reviewed by Library Journal, Publishers Weekly, Journal of Women's History and The Washington Post. Article needs some serious work, though. Haukur ( talk) 12:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added more information and some sources, although there's still a lot of improvement that can be done. The book is cited/quoted in many academic examinations of the 19th amendment fight and in works about Alice Paul, and is being reissued again in 2020. Schazjmd (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) -- Pontificalibus 14:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Jailed for Freedom
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jailed for Freedom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There seems no evidence whatever for the notability of the book, as distinct from the individual.
DGG (
talk ) 08:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
DGG (
talk ) 22:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. A ProQuest search shows that the 1995 edition was reviewed by Library Journal, Publishers Weekly, Journal of Women's History and The Washington Post. Article needs some serious work, though. Haukur ( talk) 12:35, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added more information and some sources, although there's still a lot of improvement that can be done. The book is cited/quoted in many academic examinations of the 19th amendment fight and in works about Alice Paul, and is being reissued again in 2020. Schazjmd (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.