- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Jadaun
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jadaun ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Since 2014, tagged as non notable. I don't know why its still here. WP:GNG fails, a one line article. delete Heba Aisha ( talk) 19:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha ( talk) 19:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. As I understand it, this is basically an article about a family. We need sources about notable individuals and scholarly coverage of the family in order to support an article. Despite claims of "kings" no individuals are named or linked. The first reference only mentions them once, in a list, so that's almost nothing. The second one is better but it is still only 8 mentions in a 348 page document. It is certainly not an article specifically about this one family or even one in which they are a major topic. That's not enough for an article. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 19:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. If there are not enough sources to expand this article, it should be removed. Wjddml ( talk) 05:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Jadaun
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jadaun ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Since 2014, tagged as non notable. I don't know why its still here. WP:GNG fails, a one line article. delete Heba Aisha ( talk) 19:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha ( talk) 19:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 12:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. As I understand it, this is basically an article about a family. We need sources about notable individuals and scholarly coverage of the family in order to support an article. Despite claims of "kings" no individuals are named or linked. The first reference only mentions them once, in a list, so that's almost nothing. The second one is better but it is still only 8 mentions in a 348 page document. It is certainly not an article specifically about this one family or even one in which they are a major topic. That's not enough for an article. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 19:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. If there are not enough sources to expand this article, it should be removed. Wjddml ( talk) 05:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.