No significant coverage found. She had three supporting roles in
Full Moon Features films that have articles, but that does not seem to be enough - especially with no significant coverage.
SL93 (
talk)
19:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The exact guideline says "Such a person may be considered notable if:", not that they are automatically notable.
SL93 (
talk)
20:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
And she is not automatically notable from three roles in three films when none of the roles received significant coverage.
SL93 (
talk)
20:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources are either not independent (words from co-star, an interview) and trivial coverage. One of the sources says, "This film (along with the aforementioned Hideous!) stars the beautiful Jacqueline Lovell, whose career came to screeching halt shortly after this film." Not only is a sentence not significant coverage but I would say that her career coming to a screeching halt shortly after a B-film speaks towards non-notability.
SL93 (
talk)
21:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
In less than 2 minutes, you've read all the sources added? Wow, I confess I am impressed. Anyway, begging to differ; even if her career as a b-movie star stopped it's sufficiently notable; and anyway again, I've added even more, and more exists, not that it is necessary imv. I disagree with almost everything you said but will leave it at that, thanks. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)21:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Why would I need to read the full sources when I just need to use CTRl+F to search for "Jacqueline Lovell"? Why would I need to read full sources to know that something is an interview? Same with knowing that something is just a film database like IMDb and TV.com?
SL93 (
talk)
21:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources added (by the time of your first reply to me, I will check the new sources now) do not constitute significant coverage. Here is an analysis of them:
Delete: I tend to agree with the source analysis above; the best I could find was
[17], it's not quite enough for notability. Delete for lack of sourcing, not meeting ACTOR.
Oaktree b (
talk)
00:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)reply
No significant coverage found. She had three supporting roles in
Full Moon Features films that have articles, but that does not seem to be enough - especially with no significant coverage.
SL93 (
talk)
19:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The exact guideline says "Such a person may be considered notable if:", not that they are automatically notable.
SL93 (
talk)
20:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
And she is not automatically notable from three roles in three films when none of the roles received significant coverage.
SL93 (
talk)
20:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources are either not independent (words from co-star, an interview) and trivial coverage. One of the sources says, "This film (along with the aforementioned Hideous!) stars the beautiful Jacqueline Lovell, whose career came to screeching halt shortly after this film." Not only is a sentence not significant coverage but I would say that her career coming to a screeching halt shortly after a B-film speaks towards non-notability.
SL93 (
talk)
21:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
In less than 2 minutes, you've read all the sources added? Wow, I confess I am impressed. Anyway, begging to differ; even if her career as a b-movie star stopped it's sufficiently notable; and anyway again, I've added even more, and more exists, not that it is necessary imv. I disagree with almost everything you said but will leave it at that, thanks. -
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)21:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Why would I need to read the full sources when I just need to use CTRl+F to search for "Jacqueline Lovell"? Why would I need to read full sources to know that something is an interview? Same with knowing that something is just a film database like IMDb and TV.com?
SL93 (
talk)
21:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources added (by the time of your first reply to me, I will check the new sources now) do not constitute significant coverage. Here is an analysis of them:
Delete: I tend to agree with the source analysis above; the best I could find was
[17], it's not quite enough for notability. Delete for lack of sourcing, not meeting ACTOR.
Oaktree b (
talk)
00:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)reply