The result of the debate was Relist separately Redwolf24 ( talk) 06:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC) reply
No, this isn't for the JT article himself, it's for the two sub-articles:
The Jack Thompson article was recently ripped apart and put under WP:OFFICE for having "unreliable sources." That has since been remedied by going to print sources. Given that the two sub-article also have primarily online (which have been determined as "unreliable") sources, they should be deleted before Jack Thompson tries to sues us again. Hbdragon88 03:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment I note that no-one has used the talk pages for either article to discuss cleanup, citation requests, or reliability concerns. So why the sudden jump to AfD? Jabrwock 18:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Just to note, if the articles get merged with the main one then all the Gamepolitics stuff will be removed -- Shaoken 05:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Relist separately Redwolf24 ( talk) 06:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC) reply
No, this isn't for the JT article himself, it's for the two sub-articles:
The Jack Thompson article was recently ripped apart and put under WP:OFFICE for having "unreliable sources." That has since been remedied by going to print sources. Given that the two sub-article also have primarily online (which have been determined as "unreliable") sources, they should be deleted before Jack Thompson tries to sues us again. Hbdragon88 03:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Comment I note that no-one has used the talk pages for either article to discuss cleanup, citation requests, or reliability concerns. So why the sudden jump to AfD? Jabrwock 18:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Just to note, if the articles get merged with the main one then all the Gamepolitics stuff will be removed -- Shaoken 05:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC) reply