The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Failure to meet 'sources' and 'independent of the subject' criteria in the general notability guideline. Previous nomination was removed by an editor ( User:Historygeek2207), who might potentially be the subject, in bad faith. An overwhelming majority of the references are indeed primary (18/24 if I'm counting correctly), while most of the others (like the Orcid or the newsletter) do not really attest to the notability of the subject. In addition, as I pointed out in the article's talk page, I think the editor's work on this article might go against the WP:NOTYOU policy, given that a majority of their contributions consist of working on this article specifically, and most of their other contributions involve the insertion of references to the subject's work on other entries. Demoxica ( talk) 20:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Failure to meet 'sources' and 'independent of the subject' criteria in the general notability guideline. Previous nomination was removed by an editor ( User:Historygeek2207), who might potentially be the subject, in bad faith. An overwhelming majority of the references are indeed primary (18/24 if I'm counting correctly), while most of the others (like the Orcid or the newsletter) do not really attest to the notability of the subject. In addition, as I pointed out in the article's talk page, I think the editor's work on this article might go against the WP:NOTYOU policy, given that a majority of their contributions consist of working on this article specifically, and most of their other contributions involve the insertion of references to the subject's work on other entries. Demoxica ( talk) 20:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)