- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jabal Wamm ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and I don't see any notability. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 16:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 17:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 17:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - firstly it isn't unsourced, there is a non-linked physical ref at the bottom. That said, my checking for sourcing only could demonstrate it existed and was a shade under 800m. While WP:GEOLAND is fairly forgiving, I think this mountain fails to satisfy "provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist" - we don't have that additional info. A single good source with other material is sufficient for a Keep. I was tempted by a couple of potential redirect targets, but no one article stood out making it unsuitable. Nosebagbear ( talk) 18:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jabal Wamm ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and I don't see any notability. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 16:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 17:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 17:54, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - firstly it isn't unsourced, there is a non-linked physical ref at the bottom. That said, my checking for sourcing only could demonstrate it existed and was a shade under 800m. While WP:GEOLAND is fairly forgiving, I think this mountain fails to satisfy "provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist" - we don't have that additional info. A single good source with other material is sufficient for a Keep. I was tempted by a couple of potential redirect targets, but no one article stood out making it unsuitable. Nosebagbear ( talk) 18:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.