The result was Delete - Notability not established. Reviews on softpedia are nice, to be sure- but they review almost everything. No coverage by reliable sources- bloggers, unless very well known, do not count. Who knows, perhaps this might become notable one day. But it isn't now. David Fuchs ( talk) 21:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC) reply
An unnotable suspicious proprietary derivative of the
LGPL
7-Zip, released 2 months (according to
Comparison of file archivers) (2 weeks as beta, according to the article; right before the article was created) to ago (right after that point, the article was created), having fewer features. Also, the author's nickname
“Archiver 53” and
contribution list combination with that makes it more suspicious.
AVRS 11:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
reply
Suggest Delete or Weak Merge into
7-Zip or
7z. --
AVRS 11:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete - Notability not established. Reviews on softpedia are nice, to be sure- but they review almost everything. No coverage by reliable sources- bloggers, unless very well known, do not count. Who knows, perhaps this might become notable one day. But it isn't now. David Fuchs ( talk) 21:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC) reply
An unnotable suspicious proprietary derivative of the
LGPL
7-Zip, released 2 months (according to
Comparison of file archivers) (2 weeks as beta, according to the article; right before the article was created) to ago (right after that point, the article was created), having fewer features. Also, the author's nickname
“Archiver 53” and
contribution list combination with that makes it more suspicious.
AVRS 11:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
reply
Suggest Delete or Weak Merge into
7-Zip or
7z. --
AVRS 11:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
reply