The result was Keep. Stifle ( talk) 12:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC) reply
WP:SOAP R.Schuster ( talk) 19:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
JACDEC is neither an independent organization, nor an authority or similar. Much more it seems to be a publishing company for books respectively an author's website. The website does not explain on which data the conclusions are based nor where they originate. This is a clear case of self-promotion and the obvious attempt, to establish some kind of respectability for the company with the help of wikipedia. The following evidences occur:
-- R.Schuster ( talk) 09:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Stifle ( talk) 12:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC) reply
WP:SOAP R.Schuster ( talk) 19:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC) reply
JACDEC is neither an independent organization, nor an authority or similar. Much more it seems to be a publishing company for books respectively an author's website. The website does not explain on which data the conclusions are based nor where they originate. This is a clear case of self-promotion and the obvious attempt, to establish some kind of respectability for the company with the help of wikipedia. The following evidences occur:
-- R.Schuster ( talk) 09:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply