The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Davewild (
talk) 08:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Claim to fame is being insurance commissioner of Lousiana. References are primarily links to elections results; no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. OhNoitsJamieTalk 18:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Strong Oppose - Well referenced, clearly notable per wiki guideleines. RoyalMate1 19:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Statewide elected official. Well-sourced.
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 01:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 00:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Davewild (
talk) 08:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Claim to fame is being insurance commissioner of Lousiana. References are primarily links to elections results; no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. OhNoitsJamieTalk 18:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Strong Oppose - Well referenced, clearly notable per wiki guideleines. RoyalMate1 19:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Statewide elected official. Well-sourced.
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 01:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 00:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.