- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination has been withdrawn (non-admin closure) Eddie891 Talk Work 11:56, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ivor Goodson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this academic is in any way notable, very few independent sources about him. Does not meet the standards of WP:NACADEMIC as far as I can tell, and fails to meet WP:GNG as well Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Despite the spammy award and research project listing he has enough very highly cited publications (two with over 1000 cites on Google Scholar, including the single-author book School Subjects and Curriculum Change) to pass WP:PROF#C1 and likely also WP:AUTHOR (although I have not yet had time to look for the reviews needed for that). In need of cleanup, not deletion. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There's an entire book about him and his work and it's easy to find other sources such as this chapter in another book. The subject therefore passes WP:BASIC. Andrew🐉( talk) 07:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof. A puzzling nomination. Xxanthippe ( talk) 08:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC).
- Keep, clearly notable. The article needs some work, some of which I've done - and I think that this probably supports the statement that he has an honorary doctorate from Gothenburg, stated in his personal website, but my Swedish isn't up to reading it! Was there any WP:BEFORE? Pam D 08:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- And I've just added, as "Further Reading", the 2019 Routledge book Storying the Public Intellectual: Commentaries on the Impact and Influence of the Work of Ivor Goodson . "
No evidence that this academic is in any way notable
"? But the article does need work. Pam D 08:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- And I've just added, as "Further Reading", the 2019 Routledge book Storying the Public Intellectual: Commentaries on the Impact and Influence of the Work of Ivor Goodson . "
- Happy to withdraw good faith nomination, I did do WP:BEFORE but I was less sure about requirements of WP:NACADEMIC. Can someone close this? Joseph 2302 ( talk) 10:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination has been withdrawn (non-admin closure) Eddie891 Talk Work 11:56, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ivor Goodson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that this academic is in any way notable, very few independent sources about him. Does not meet the standards of WP:NACADEMIC as far as I can tell, and fails to meet WP:GNG as well Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 07:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Despite the spammy award and research project listing he has enough very highly cited publications (two with over 1000 cites on Google Scholar, including the single-author book School Subjects and Curriculum Change) to pass WP:PROF#C1 and likely also WP:AUTHOR (although I have not yet had time to look for the reviews needed for that). In need of cleanup, not deletion. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There's an entire book about him and his work and it's easy to find other sources such as this chapter in another book. The subject therefore passes WP:BASIC. Andrew🐉( talk) 07:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof. A puzzling nomination. Xxanthippe ( talk) 08:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC).
- Keep, clearly notable. The article needs some work, some of which I've done - and I think that this probably supports the statement that he has an honorary doctorate from Gothenburg, stated in his personal website, but my Swedish isn't up to reading it! Was there any WP:BEFORE? Pam D 08:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- And I've just added, as "Further Reading", the 2019 Routledge book Storying the Public Intellectual: Commentaries on the Impact and Influence of the Work of Ivor Goodson . "
No evidence that this academic is in any way notable
"? But the article does need work. Pam D 08:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- And I've just added, as "Further Reading", the 2019 Routledge book Storying the Public Intellectual: Commentaries on the Impact and Influence of the Work of Ivor Goodson . "
- Happy to withdraw good faith nomination, I did do WP:BEFORE but I was less sure about requirements of WP:NACADEMIC. Can someone close this? Joseph 2302 ( talk) 10:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.