The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC) reply
ATTENTION!
If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum pointing to this page, please note that this is not a vote. This is a discussion among Wikipedia editors and is aimed at reaching a consensus on whether the article is suitable for this encyclopedia. The outcome of AfD nominations are primarily determined by the quality of arguments for or against deletion; the process is immune to ballot-stuffing or sockpuppetry. You can participate in the discussion and post your opinions here, even if you are new. Deletion is based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so please take a look at them if you have not already. For more information, see Wikipedia deletion policy. Please
sign your posts on this page by adding |
Non-notable student, who does not appear to satisfy WP:BIO guidelines. Googling his name as given in the title brings up a grand total of 1 hit. Delete as vanity (note the similarity in the Geocities URL given and the username of the creator.) Prod contested without explanation. Kimchi.sg 07:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The reason I am adding this page is to jump infront of media bad mouthing> There are at least a couple thousand people who have expressed intrest in this African American figure.
I was inclined to create this page by two very prominent photographers and Event planners as he will be heavily involved in very large congregational campaigns.
-This is not a vanity page- I am a web creator> Please reconsider- public demand will persist>
An article is "important" enough to be included in Wikipedia if any one of the following is true:
If an article is "important" according to the above then there's no reason to delete it on the basis of it being:
Note: in order to satifiy Wiki notability I have removed his affilation with dozens of Political and Social organization, this is not my will.
-- Adam15obong 17:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Yes, this chap shows signs of developing into a noteworthy human being, if his ego is allowed to remain human-sized. He may even end up here one day.
But currently, I'm amazed that so many people can read the Wikipedia criteria and still argue to "keep"! He's not notable. Yet.
I stay with my original Delete, somewhat bewildered by this debate. Dweller 09:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Before I let this issue go let me address those concerns, (I assure you this is in no way a ploy for sympathy, the sheer fact that I have had this much difficulty confirming this young mans reputation is beyond me. He disserves better then this.)
I suppose your all right the kid is a young progress black and he will pop up in the future, the purpose was to get this out before his next campaign so maybe he might get some of the reputation he disserves… but you guys run Wikipedia and I’m just a web-designer… I guess we’ll just wait tell he’s not young anymore…. Since that’s what defines importance.-- Adam15obong 02:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC) reply
ATTENTION!
If you came to this page because a friend asked you to do so, or because you saw a message on an online forum pointing to this page, please note that this is not a vote. This is a discussion among Wikipedia editors and is aimed at reaching a consensus on whether the article is suitable for this encyclopedia. The outcome of AfD nominations are primarily determined by the quality of arguments for or against deletion; the process is immune to ballot-stuffing or sockpuppetry. You can participate in the discussion and post your opinions here, even if you are new. Deletion is based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so please take a look at them if you have not already. For more information, see Wikipedia deletion policy. Please
sign your posts on this page by adding |
Non-notable student, who does not appear to satisfy WP:BIO guidelines. Googling his name as given in the title brings up a grand total of 1 hit. Delete as vanity (note the similarity in the Geocities URL given and the username of the creator.) Prod contested without explanation. Kimchi.sg 07:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC) reply
The reason I am adding this page is to jump infront of media bad mouthing> There are at least a couple thousand people who have expressed intrest in this African American figure.
I was inclined to create this page by two very prominent photographers and Event planners as he will be heavily involved in very large congregational campaigns.
-This is not a vanity page- I am a web creator> Please reconsider- public demand will persist>
An article is "important" enough to be included in Wikipedia if any one of the following is true:
If an article is "important" according to the above then there's no reason to delete it on the basis of it being:
Note: in order to satifiy Wiki notability I have removed his affilation with dozens of Political and Social organization, this is not my will.
-- Adam15obong 17:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Yes, this chap shows signs of developing into a noteworthy human being, if his ego is allowed to remain human-sized. He may even end up here one day.
But currently, I'm amazed that so many people can read the Wikipedia criteria and still argue to "keep"! He's not notable. Yet.
I stay with my original Delete, somewhat bewildered by this debate. Dweller 09:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC) reply
Before I let this issue go let me address those concerns, (I assure you this is in no way a ploy for sympathy, the sheer fact that I have had this much difficulty confirming this young mans reputation is beyond me. He disserves better then this.)
I suppose your all right the kid is a young progress black and he will pop up in the future, the purpose was to get this out before his next campaign so maybe he might get some of the reputation he disserves… but you guys run Wikipedia and I’m just a web-designer… I guess we’ll just wait tell he’s not young anymore…. Since that’s what defines importance.-- Adam15obong 02:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) reply