The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article contains two dead links, no sign of notability, and the site link [
[1]] purportedly to the organization's web site is just a single page blog. The organization name comes up a few times in the media but there's no evidence that it even exists anymore.
Timtempleton (
talk) 23:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Page was created without the afd2 template. Nominator did not transclude it to a daily log until today. I've added the template--no further comment on the nomination itself. --
Finngalltalk 17:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - there's a ton of stuff about it but it seems like it's related to accusations against the founders of being secret jihadists and anti-Israel, none of it in reliable sources (though I didn't search too far). I deleted the external link as it seems like the "official site" domain expired and was taken over by an e-cig marketer (thus the "blog" you saw).
—МандичкаYO 😜 03:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JAaron95Talk 17:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article contains two dead links, no sign of notability, and the site link [
[1]] purportedly to the organization's web site is just a single page blog. The organization name comes up a few times in the media but there's no evidence that it even exists anymore.
Timtempleton (
talk) 23:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Page was created without the afd2 template. Nominator did not transclude it to a daily log until today. I've added the template--no further comment on the nomination itself. --
Finngalltalk 17:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - there's a ton of stuff about it but it seems like it's related to accusations against the founders of being secret jihadists and anti-Israel, none of it in reliable sources (though I didn't search too far). I deleted the external link as it seems like the "official site" domain expired and was taken over by an e-cig marketer (thus the "blog" you saw).
—МандичкаYO 😜 03:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JAaron95Talk 17:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.