The result was merge to Islam and animals. I think a compromise is the best solution: merge, adding any content not already present in the main article. DGG ( talk ) 02:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Aside from the 2st two paragrapsh, rest are all individual incidents from tabloids rather than the topic Islam and Dogs. Its more like taxi drivers and dogs, food stores and dogs, this can really be attributed to anything and nothing specific to Islam etc... some of which has been removed. However, the main content is already discussed in Islam_and_animals#Dogs and again in Dogs_in_religion#Islam . So it does not seem a separate page is required here. Asifkhanj ( talk) 23:53, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Islam and animals. I think a compromise is the best solution: merge, adding any content not already present in the main article. DGG ( talk ) 02:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Aside from the 2st two paragrapsh, rest are all individual incidents from tabloids rather than the topic Islam and Dogs. Its more like taxi drivers and dogs, food stores and dogs, this can really be attributed to anything and nothing specific to Islam etc... some of which has been removed. However, the main content is already discussed in Islam_and_animals#Dogs and again in Dogs_in_religion#Islam . So it does not seem a separate page is required here. Asifkhanj ( talk) 23:53, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply