The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. The references in the article are invariably based on company announcements and PR. References fail
WP:CORPDEPTH and/or
WP:ORGIND. Happy to revisit this nomination if anyone finds good references.
HighKing++ 20:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm on the fence with this one. I'm not sure if the nominator noted down the previous AfD and looked at the sources that were provided, however since then I cannot find any sort of major press release regarding the firm.
Nightfury13:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Nightfury since the date of the last AfD in 2015, the
WP:NCORP guidelines have clarified what is meant by "Significant Coverage"
WP:CORPDEPTH and "Independent Content"
WP:ORGIND in paricular. Therefore unlike the previous AfD, references based on company announcements or mentions-in-passing, etc, are no longer deemed to establish the notability of organizations/companies.
HighKing++ 20:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The current sources in the article are either typical corporate announcements, PR, or articles about a different subject,
GoCar, whose notability is not inherited by ICR. Some additional references to ICR are out there in the news, as a commenter in the previous deletion discussion raised, but these are all trivial mentions of ICR within an article on a different subject, or reporting on typical corporate activities like annual performance - not substantial enough to meet
WP:CORPDEPTH. The least trivial of these, which was provided in the previous deletion discussion, is
Thrifty owners agree to bail out rival ICR - Sunday Times, The (London, England) - Sunday, May 16, 2010, which perhaps suggests a bit of notability but certainly not enough to meet the GNG. I did encounter some more substantial articles on the owner (?),
Colm Menton, who might themselves be notable (
[1],
[2]). -
M.Nelson (
talk)
11:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. The references in the article are invariably based on company announcements and PR. References fail
WP:CORPDEPTH and/or
WP:ORGIND. Happy to revisit this nomination if anyone finds good references.
HighKing++ 20:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm on the fence with this one. I'm not sure if the nominator noted down the previous AfD and looked at the sources that were provided, however since then I cannot find any sort of major press release regarding the firm.
Nightfury13:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Nightfury since the date of the last AfD in 2015, the
WP:NCORP guidelines have clarified what is meant by "Significant Coverage"
WP:CORPDEPTH and "Independent Content"
WP:ORGIND in paricular. Therefore unlike the previous AfD, references based on company announcements or mentions-in-passing, etc, are no longer deemed to establish the notability of organizations/companies.
HighKing++ 20:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. The current sources in the article are either typical corporate announcements, PR, or articles about a different subject,
GoCar, whose notability is not inherited by ICR. Some additional references to ICR are out there in the news, as a commenter in the previous deletion discussion raised, but these are all trivial mentions of ICR within an article on a different subject, or reporting on typical corporate activities like annual performance - not substantial enough to meet
WP:CORPDEPTH. The least trivial of these, which was provided in the previous deletion discussion, is
Thrifty owners agree to bail out rival ICR - Sunday Times, The (London, England) - Sunday, May 16, 2010, which perhaps suggests a bit of notability but certainly not enough to meet the GNG. I did encounter some more substantial articles on the owner (?),
Colm Menton, who might themselves be notable (
[1],
[2]). -
M.Nelson (
talk)
11:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.