The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Michig (
talk) 14:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)reply
No evidence to suggest significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Key word is "significant". Furthermore, the single listed source links to 500 error.
Mr. Guye (
talk) 03:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose: Link to single source just needed to be corrected. significant independent coverage in reliable sources is subjective and could be used as an argument to keep this entry to help those who might want to out more about her when cannot find her elsewhere..Google did return 43 search results. Article just needs to be improved and expanded upon.
len (
talk) 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 05:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 04:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep The lengthy article about her career in The Herald at the time of her death called her "one of her generation's stalwarts of Scottish theatre." The current version of the article over-emphasizes her minor TV roles. She was best known as a stage actress.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 07:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Michig (
talk) 14:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)reply
No evidence to suggest significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Key word is "significant". Furthermore, the single listed source links to 500 error.
Mr. Guye (
talk) 03:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose: Link to single source just needed to be corrected. significant independent coverage in reliable sources is subjective and could be used as an argument to keep this entry to help those who might want to out more about her when cannot find her elsewhere..Google did return 43 search results. Article just needs to be improved and expanded upon.
len (
talk) 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 05:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NORTH AMERICA1000 04:33, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep The lengthy article about her career in The Herald at the time of her death called her "one of her generation's stalwarts of Scottish theatre." The current version of the article over-emphasizes her minor TV roles. She was best known as a stage actress.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 07:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.