From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TigerShark ( talk) 01:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Iraq national under-17 football team results

Iraq national under-17 football team results (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Historical results of the under-17 team are hardly verifiable compared to results of senior national teams. Considering the (relative) lack of significant coverage, both for the scope of the list and its entries, this seems to fail WP:LISTN and WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia is not a directory of everything in the universe that exists or has existed). ComplexRational ( talk) 14:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply

I understand where this discussion is coming from. However, all the official tournaments like the AFC U17 Asian Cup or U17 World Cup are documented and verifiable. See: https://www.fifa.com/tournaments/mens/u17worldcup/brazil2019 or https://www.the-afc.com/en/national/afc_u17_asian_cup.html. So I dont fully agree with the argument that it's not verifiable.

Suren01 ( talk) 17:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Official tournaments are another matter: there is evidently enough coverage of each specific tournament (as an event) to ascertain their notability, and so each edition has its own article. However, the comprehensive set of matches of the Iraqi U17 team, which as outlined here and in the previous AfDs (thanks for the links, Spiderone), lacks significant coverage and fails NLIST/NOTSTATS. ComplexRational ( talk) 18:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TigerShark ( talk) 01:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Iraq national under-17 football team results

Iraq national under-17 football team results (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Historical results of the under-17 team are hardly verifiable compared to results of senior national teams. Considering the (relative) lack of significant coverage, both for the scope of the list and its entries, this seems to fail WP:LISTN and WP:NOTDIRECTORY (Wikipedia is not a directory of everything in the universe that exists or has existed). ComplexRational ( talk) 14:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply

I understand where this discussion is coming from. However, all the official tournaments like the AFC U17 Asian Cup or U17 World Cup are documented and verifiable. See: https://www.fifa.com/tournaments/mens/u17worldcup/brazil2019 or https://www.the-afc.com/en/national/afc_u17_asian_cup.html. So I dont fully agree with the argument that it's not verifiable.

Suren01 ( talk) 17:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Official tournaments are another matter: there is evidently enough coverage of each specific tournament (as an event) to ascertain their notability, and so each edition has its own article. However, the comprehensive set of matches of the Iraqi U17 team, which as outlined here and in the previous AfDs (thanks for the links, Spiderone), lacks significant coverage and fails NLIST/NOTSTATS. ComplexRational ( talk) 18:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook