- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Investments in Rio de Janeiro (2014-2016)
- Investments in Rio de Janeiro (2014-2016) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
advertising. User Systema Firjan promoting the works of Systema Firjan The Banner talk 20:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not encyclopedic. Szzuk ( talk) 21:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - unencyclopaedic and lacking independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 23:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Snow delete. Seriously? Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Obvious Delete. As above. Egsan Bacon ( talk) 01:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously. At best WP:PROMOTION with little or no encyclopedia value. -- Jersey92 ( talk) 13:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Insufficient sources and content to support a stand-alone page. Victão Lopes Fala! 17:20, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete the report was crystal ball, the article is indiscriminate, and it has no coverage. -- Bejnar ( talk) 02:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Investments in Rio de Janeiro (2014-2016)
- Investments in Rio de Janeiro (2014-2016) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
advertising. User Systema Firjan promoting the works of Systema Firjan The Banner talk 20:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not encyclopedic. Szzuk ( talk) 21:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - unencyclopaedic and lacking independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 23:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Snow delete. Seriously? Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Obvious Delete. As above. Egsan Bacon ( talk) 01:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously. At best WP:PROMOTION with little or no encyclopedia value. -- Jersey92 ( talk) 13:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Insufficient sources and content to support a stand-alone page. Victão Lopes Fala! 17:20, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete the report was crystal ball, the article is indiscriminate, and it has no coverage. -- Bejnar ( talk) 02:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.