The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.Michig (
talk) 06:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply
I recently
AfDedOutro (video gaming), and I think all the same reasoning applies here. This is a thing that exists in video games, sure, but it's not covered as a separate entity. The best you'll do is find
mentionofparticularintrosequences, not a discussion of the concept itself. Essentially, it fails
WP:GNG in the same way outro did. —Torchiesttalkedits 00:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as I'm not finding anything confidently better.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. I agree, with my same rationale: there are intro sequences, but without
reliable sources writing about them, this is just
WP:OR. A quick search on the custom
WP:VG/RSsearch engine brings up some results, but nothing in-depth about the actual concept. Notable intro sequences can be mentioned at its respective game.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete for the same reasons that Outro was deleted.
ZettaComposer (
talk) 14:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. This article isn't prepared to do much better than a dictionary definition. czar 07:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.Michig (
talk) 06:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply
I recently
AfDedOutro (video gaming), and I think all the same reasoning applies here. This is a thing that exists in video games, sure, but it's not covered as a separate entity. The best you'll do is find
mentionofparticularintrosequences, not a discussion of the concept itself. Essentially, it fails
WP:GNG in the same way outro did. —Torchiesttalkedits 00:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as I'm not finding anything confidently better.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. I agree, with my same rationale: there are intro sequences, but without
reliable sources writing about them, this is just
WP:OR. A quick search on the custom
WP:VG/RSsearch engine brings up some results, but nothing in-depth about the actual concept. Notable intro sequences can be mentioned at its respective game.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete for the same reasons that Outro was deleted.
ZettaComposer (
talk) 14:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. This article isn't prepared to do much better than a dictionary definition. czar 07:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.