The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 01:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable news presenter just doing her job. Sources like whopopular.com can't establish notability (popularity != notability, and this isn't a reliable source to begin with). A Google search didn't reveal anything better source-wise.
GermanJoe (
talk) 05:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 23:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 05:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as questionable for the applicable notability, unlikely notable local journalist.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as not notable. --
OpenFuture (
talk) 14:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 01:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Non-notable news presenter just doing her job. Sources like whopopular.com can't establish notability (popularity != notability, and this isn't a reliable source to begin with). A Google search didn't reveal anything better source-wise.
GermanJoe (
talk) 05:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources.
Philafrenzy (
talk) 23:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 05:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as questionable for the applicable notability, unlikely notable local journalist.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as not notable. --
OpenFuture (
talk) 14:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.