The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator with only other delete !vote saying nothing more than "per nominator".
ThaddeusB (
talk) 22:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)reply
This is a well disguised advert. Many of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material. This is
WP:BOMBARD. If it can be rescued, so be it, but adverts have no place on Wikipedia.
FiddleFaddle 18:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn as nominator. My view is that sufficient changes have been made to allow this to remain. The article today cannot be criticised the way I have in the nomination.
FiddleFaddle 18:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. per norm
Oo7565 (
talk) 23:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I've left a message
here on Timtrent's talk page – there are additional international sources (FT, Bloomberg, Forbes, The Banker, Jeune Afrique) that should establish notability. The 'regurgitated press releases' are all in Nigerian national newspapers with by lines but clearly there are issues to resolve so let's have a discussion about how to get it into better shape. Thanks.
HOgilvy (
talk) 16:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Now redrafted based on better sources as per discussion with Timtrent
here – see the article talk page for explanation.
HOgilvy (
talk) 18:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator with only other delete !vote saying nothing more than "per nominator".
ThaddeusB (
talk) 22:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)reply
This is a well disguised advert. Many of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material. This is
WP:BOMBARD. If it can be rescued, so be it, but adverts have no place on Wikipedia.
FiddleFaddle 18:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn as nominator. My view is that sufficient changes have been made to allow this to remain. The article today cannot be criticised the way I have in the nomination.
FiddleFaddle 18:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. per norm
Oo7565 (
talk) 23:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
I've left a message
here on Timtrent's talk page – there are additional international sources (FT, Bloomberg, Forbes, The Banker, Jeune Afrique) that should establish notability. The 'regurgitated press releases' are all in Nigerian national newspapers with by lines but clearly there are issues to resolve so let's have a discussion about how to get it into better shape. Thanks.
HOgilvy (
talk) 16:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Now redrafted based on better sources as per discussion with Timtrent
here – see the article talk page for explanation.
HOgilvy (
talk) 18:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.