The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was copyright violation, right down to the copyright itself at the bottom of the page.
PMDrive1061 (
talk) 01:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Looks like someone beat me to the punch. I had it down for violation of G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion.Nezzadar (
talk) 01:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
It's also a copyvio as listed at the bottom. Going away as a speedy. --
PMDrive1061 (
talk) 01:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was copyright violation, right down to the copyright itself at the bottom of the page.
PMDrive1061 (
talk) 01:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Looks like someone beat me to the punch. I had it down for violation of G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion.Nezzadar (
talk) 01:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
It's also a copyvio as listed at the bottom. Going away as a speedy. --
PMDrive1061 (
talk) 01:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.