The result was delete. The two last "keep" opinions do not address the sourcing problems that are raised in the nomination, and are discounted. Sandstein 22:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC) reply
A decades old hoax that appears not to have garnered much if any independent notice. Notability is not temporary, of course, but I cannot find any evidence that it had any when it was originated either. Even within the ufology community, this appears to be a minor claim. At the most, we might should have a passing mention at UFO conspiracy theory. - Eldereft ( cont.) 16:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC) - Eldereft ( cont.) 16:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The two last "keep" opinions do not address the sourcing problems that are raised in the nomination, and are discounted. Sandstein 22:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC) reply
A decades old hoax that appears not to have garnered much if any independent notice. Notability is not temporary, of course, but I cannot find any evidence that it had any when it was originated either. Even within the ufology community, this appears to be a minor claim. At the most, we might should have a passing mention at UFO conspiracy theory. - Eldereft ( cont.) 16:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC) - Eldereft ( cont.) 16:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC) reply