- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Internet Workshop
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Internet Workshop ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not sure what to make of this one The topic doesn't seem notable and anything that talks about a "newly emerging form of literacy, the Internet" , in 2020, may be unredeemable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 22:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Article looks like an WP:OR. The term has found some coverage in scholar, but I'm not sure if they're connected to the contents of the article. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 05:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete based on having a gander through Scholar. Uses of the term fall into two camps: a) titles of internet workshops (non-capitalized) - clearly not applicable here; b) uses of Internet Workshop as a concept - all of which are sourced to one D. Leu, who coincidentally also provides three of the four functional/usable references in the article. This appears to be a novel coinage for a specific teaching approach that did not take of. - Also agree with Andy that the article displays rather awkward levels of zeerust. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Internet Workshop
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Internet Workshop ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not sure what to make of this one The topic doesn't seem notable and anything that talks about a "newly emerging form of literacy, the Internet" , in 2020, may be unredeemable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 22:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Article looks like an WP:OR. The term has found some coverage in scholar, but I'm not sure if they're connected to the contents of the article. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 05:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete based on having a gander through Scholar. Uses of the term fall into two camps: a) titles of internet workshops (non-capitalized) - clearly not applicable here; b) uses of Internet Workshop as a concept - all of which are sourced to one D. Leu, who coincidentally also provides three of the four functional/usable references in the article. This appears to be a novel coinage for a specific teaching approach that did not take of. - Also agree with Andy that the article displays rather awkward levels of zeerust. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 23:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.