The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 16:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Despite calls for better information to back up WP:ORG requirements through article tag since October 2012, there appear to be no reliable sources showing notability of this organization. Its existence is unquestioned, but the organization website itself suggests a very obscure, low-membership organization, whose members appear to the outside world solely through self-published books. There is basically no external information about the organization as such available through any reliable source. WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 19:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 16:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC) reply
Despite calls for better information to back up WP:ORG requirements through article tag since October 2012, there appear to be no reliable sources showing notability of this organization. Its existence is unquestioned, but the organization website itself suggests a very obscure, low-membership organization, whose members appear to the outside world solely through self-published books. There is basically no external information about the organization as such available through any reliable source. WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 19:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply