The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.Michig (
talk) 07:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
No source included. Can not find any third party source for this event. I have tried google news, scholar and book search. -
Mar11 (
talk) 18:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Zilch on GNews, GScholar and GBooks, and in my case only 244 hits for a regular Google search, ergo fails
WP:GNG. -
HyperGaruda (
talk) 18:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as still questionable for solid notability and its improvements.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 04:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: as a modern event, one would expect it to have significant internet coverage if it is notable, but no such coverage exists. There are hits for the organisers websites, but nothing third party that is not self-published. All of this makes it fail
WP:GNG. —
crh23 (
Talk) 06:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.Michig (
talk) 07:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)reply
No source included. Can not find any third party source for this event. I have tried google news, scholar and book search. -
Mar11 (
talk) 18:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Zilch on GNews, GScholar and GBooks, and in my case only 244 hits for a regular Google search, ergo fails
WP:GNG. -
HyperGaruda (
talk) 18:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as still questionable for solid notability and its improvements.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 04:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: as a modern event, one would expect it to have significant internet coverage if it is notable, but no such coverage exists. There are hits for the organisers websites, but nothing third party that is not self-published. All of this makes it fail
WP:GNG. —
crh23 (
Talk) 06:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.