- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 05:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
International Reporting Program
- International Reporting Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
article on a single academic program within a school of journalism. The school of journalism is notable, the program not. It might be worth am ention in the main article, but I'm not even sure of that, and the name is too generic to be a useful redirect--anyone lookingfor it would look for the article on the school. DGG ( talk ) 06:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Nom. Honestly this one could probably have been killed with PROD. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 07:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Award winning journalism program that has produced several notable works and received very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. At the very least it would be more appropriate to merge into the parent subject (The Journalism School) rather than engage in wholesale deletion of a program that has been influential and significant in its achievements in the field of journalism. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 03:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, received recognition in the form of awards, also good secondary source coverage. — Cirt ( talk) 13:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 04:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:GNG per the refs. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 05:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with University of British Columbia Graduate School of Journalism. Program is verifiable and notable as per the previous comments but shouldn't require an article of it's own as per WP:PAGEDECIDE. N4 ( talk) 02:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 05:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
International Reporting Program
- International Reporting Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
article on a single academic program within a school of journalism. The school of journalism is notable, the program not. It might be worth am ention in the main article, but I'm not even sure of that, and the name is too generic to be a useful redirect--anyone lookingfor it would look for the article on the school. DGG ( talk ) 06:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Nom. Honestly this one could probably have been killed with PROD. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 07:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Award winning journalism program that has produced several notable works and received very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. At the very least it would be more appropriate to merge into the parent subject (The Journalism School) rather than engage in wholesale deletion of a program that has been influential and significant in its achievements in the field of journalism. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 03:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, received recognition in the form of awards, also good secondary source coverage. — Cirt ( talk) 13:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 04:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:GNG per the refs. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 05:08, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with University of British Columbia Graduate School of Journalism. Program is verifiable and notable as per the previous comments but shouldn't require an article of it's own as per WP:PAGEDECIDE. N4 ( talk) 02:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.