- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
International Hedgehog Registry
- International Hedgehog Registry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined PROD. This registry is linked from a lot of hedgehog websites, but I couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources. The references in the article do not establish notability. Moswento talky 08:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Non notable topic per nom. Passing mentions in a book and in the acknowledgements to a scientific paper are not significant coverage and the other references ... well ... they're "other". Philg88 ♦ talk 17:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I think the references are sufficient. This is like a
Cat registry, but for hedgehogs.
Eastmain (
talk •
contribs) 17:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- I understand the concept of a "hedgehog registry", I just fail to see any real discussion of it in sources. I definitely don't agree that the current references are sufficient. They amount to 7 words on the Improbable Research website, 10 words in a book about hedgehogs, a 14-word acknowledgement in a single academic journal paper, and a post on an internet forum. Nowhere near WP:GNG. Moswento talky 07:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
International Hedgehog Registry
- International Hedgehog Registry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined PROD. This registry is linked from a lot of hedgehog websites, but I couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources. The references in the article do not establish notability. Moswento talky 08:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Non notable topic per nom. Passing mentions in a book and in the acknowledgements to a scientific paper are not significant coverage and the other references ... well ... they're "other". Philg88 ♦ talk 17:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I think the references are sufficient. This is like a
Cat registry, but for hedgehogs.
Eastmain (
talk •
contribs) 17:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- I understand the concept of a "hedgehog registry", I just fail to see any real discussion of it in sources. I definitely don't agree that the current references are sufficient. They amount to 7 words on the Improbable Research website, 10 words in a book about hedgehogs, a 14-word acknowledgement in a single academic journal paper, and a post on an internet forum. Nowhere near WP:GNG. Moswento talky 07:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.